Posts: 1,962
Threads: 70
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation:
0
Speaking from experience, it is not fun.
Also, as someone who does have a gaming budget, it's a fun-per-slot issue for me.
Posts: 2,752
Threads: 70
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation:
0
Well, I don't mean to make it difficult for people. Dogmatic, I am not. I'll agree to the shorter drop period if that makes everybody happy.
Posts: 985
Threads: 31
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation:
0
Perhaps a Warlords format with 6 players each controlling two kingdoms might be in order? Similar to HH's dual duel. Just a thought.
Posts: 2,570
Threads: 39
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation:
0
I know I really like the two kingdom version better. i would think it is a little more forgiving about drops as well.
Posts: 5,607
Threads: 618
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation:
0
I can see both sides of this. My first thought is Alamaze was designed as at least a 12 kingdom, full diplomacy game. Highest caliber strategy that can be provided.
I feel for the Warlords players - if you are in, you're in for good. Sometime later this year, I hope to have Gray Mouser have his first Warlords game.
Posts: 549
Threads: 11
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation:
0
I was thinking of getting into my first Warlords game. Would this be to advanced for my first attempt?
Posts: 2,752
Threads: 70
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation:
0
Ruingurth, this game is full. It probably wouldn't have been the best place for you to start, though.
