08-20-2013, 12:25 AM
Is it possible to 170 or 171 multiple times with the same group on the same turn? Or does only the first order actually resolve?
170/171 Question
|
08-20-2013, 12:25 AM
Is it possible to 170 or 171 multiple times with the same group on the same turn? Or does only the first order actually resolve?
08-20-2013, 01:05 AM
Why would you want to? There with another kingdom's group?
08-20-2013, 01:18 AM
I'm assuming -- perhaps erroneously -- that there is a random element to 170/171, just like with political emissaries. If that's the case, then multiple 171's (in particular) might be helpful.
If that's an incorrect assumption, then never mind. ![]()
08-20-2013, 02:25 PM
(08-20-2013, 01:18 AM)HeadHoncho Wrote: I'm assuming -- perhaps erroneously -- that there is a random element to 170/171, just like with political emissaries. If that's the case, then multiple 171's (in particular) might be helpful. 171 is much stronger than 170. If you doubt your success rate I would try 171 and save an order. Ideally a PC is neutral OR human controlled and you are friendly in the region. Otherwise you need a pretty big group in most cases. (If you did not already know) Best of luck,
08-20-2013, 07:06 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-20-2013, 07:06 PM by HeadHoncho.)
Thanks, I get that, I guess I'm more curious about whether there's a random element to 171, to see if multiple 171's would be beneficial (or even possible).
Separately, has anyone tried 171 in a Suspicious or Hostile region? Just wondering it it's worth bothering, even with a higher-level wizard.
08-20-2013, 09:56 PM
(08-20-2013, 07:06 PM)HeadHoncho Wrote: Thanks, I get that, I guess I'm more curious about whether there's a random element to 171, to see if multiple 171's would be beneficial (or even possible). Playing the DW in 100 I was able to 171 other kingdom's towns while Suspicious with a 25kish group, a marshal, and a p3. Looking back I went 3 for 5 on those 171 attempts. I have no idea about multiple 171's though but seems easy enough to test.
08-20-2013, 09:59 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-20-2013, 09:59 PM by HeadHoncho.)
Thanks, that's a helpful data point (or five points, rather).
Anyone else? ![]()
08-21-2013, 02:27 PM
(08-20-2013, 09:56 PM)kik1661 Wrote:(08-20-2013, 07:06 PM)HeadHoncho Wrote: Thanks, I get that, I guess I'm more curious about whether there's a random element to 171, to see if multiple 171's would be beneficial (or even possible). I would imagine you could cast multiple 171s vs any PC, provided you have enough wizards. Each wizard can only cast once per turn.
Keeope
|
Users browsing this thread: |
3 Guest(s) |