Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forum Communication only contest
(03-19-2018, 05:00 AM)Ohman the heartless Wrote: AN King
    I reread your post, and I must have initially missed the restriction on not attacking you or you allies, in future turns.  I deliberately did not take any pc's in Torvale to allow you substantial.  But it was turn 32 and no reasonable player would sit back and not try to stop a victory.  You may still Achieve victory, but it won't be through control or substantial in Torvale.  I will burn all the pc's there and control the region with just 1 pc if needed.  

Great SA
   The new NE Capitol is at HL if you are interested

AN - SO
Does it really matter now what the deal said. Even in your above statement you are trying to remove the second part of the deal as well that I get substantial in Torvale.   You can feel what you like and try to justify what you wish.  The fact is you broke your deal and have no remorse for it.   I have seen you try to make reprimands for mistake you have made.  I see none of that here.  Infact you continue to change what you feel is fair after I spared you to allow you to continue fighting others.
You will find most players do keep there deals even at the expense of the game so they can make future deals with others.  Now everyone knows your deals have a catch written or not.
Reply

(03-19-2018, 05:00 AM)Ohman the heartless Wrote: AN King
    I reread your post, and I must have initially missed the restriction on not attacking you or you allies, in future turns.  I deliberately did not take any pc's in Torvale to allow you substantial.  But it was turn 32 and no reasonable player would sit back and not try to stop a victory.  You may still Achieve victory, but it won't be through control or substantial in Torvale.  I will burn all the pc's there and control the region with just 1 pc if needed.  

Great SA
   The new NE Capitol is at HL if you are interested

Hahaha  Go get it buddy.  And that 1 pop in torvale will burn too
Reply

SO _ AN
You posted that I was preparing to make a move. You knew before any attack that I was poised in Oakendell. Had I not misread our earlier agreement or had you reminded me of it, no attack would have been made, and the game would have ended. Neither of those 2 things occured. The NE is currently destroying pc's in both Torvale and Amberland. Mayhap we should have fought it out on turn 21. It is now turn 33, I still have 11 wizards and 16 emmissaries of baron or higher, 25 orders and an influence of 24.6. All my wizards can dome and charm, as I am sure yours can as well.
I saw how close you were to winning and yes moved to prevent that. Do I regret misreading the agreement of Feb 23. Yes. Do I regret my attempt to prevent your victory no. This is solely based on what I initially thought our agreement to have been. As I have stated quite loudly, I hate all forms of diplo games, outside of the team format.
There have been too many drops, 1 takeover, and this game has 8 turns to run before ending. I am poised to do almost anything at this point.

Yes, having reread the post of 2/23 I did break that agreement. Now, it seems everyone is prepared to cede you the win. I am allied with the IL and SA, and will not attack them. I will honor that 2/23 agreement and not attack the DA. GN nor yourself. I will continue and focus on the one enemy I AM allowed to fight the NE. If this does not suit the remaining players, well there is nothing more I can do.
Reply

Why you picking on me man!!!! Lol I love it, Shall we meet on turn 39, with all our units and just have at it? Smile
Reply

SA-SO The faithful of Uranus are a bit surprised to find we are your allies given that you took over several of our pop centers a couple of turns ago! We didn't object because we didn't think there was any alliance but we are certainly glad to know you are aiming your firepower elsewhere at present.
Reply

(03-14-2018, 03:39 PM)Draugr Wrote: AN - SO

We see you have moved emmies and groups into Oakandale and The Northern Mists.  Is it your intent to break a signed deal between our kingdoms?

I did try to remind you.   And I waited 1 day before askin the GN/DA to help.   Again mentioning you were breaking our deal.

I will for give you but it will be awhile.
Reply

(03-19-2018, 12:23 AM)DuPont Wrote: SA-GN The faithful of Uranus send you greetings. We have always gotten along well in this conflict and we hope to see that continue. We have no plans to attack your group and hope the same is true for you. We would consider it very sporting of you if you allow us to take care of the problem you came to solve.

GN -SA  It is agreed, our group will move on without combat with you.  Obviously the King of Uranus should be able to deal with these hemorrhoids without assistance from the GN
Reply

GN -  AN 
SO picked off my town in Torvale.
  You are welcome to it if you can use it.

The people of Kandor (Area QF) have rebelled against our rulership! They
                           have joined the Sorcerer kingdom. It is believed their Baron Bemm was
                           behind the uprising.
Reply

To All
I thought the turn would process after my last post. I never checked to make sure. Got up at 6:00 am this morning and found it had run. I am forwarding my last turn to the GN and AN. Feel free to share with any allies.
PT
I would have loved to have battled you to the end, but this will be the last post of the SO for game 5104.

Les please accept my heartfelt apologize!
Reply

(03-19-2018, 11:13 AM)Ohman the heartless Wrote: To All
   I thought the turn would process after my last post.  I never checked to make sure. Got up at 6:00 am this morning and found it had run.  I am forwarding my last turn to the GN and AN.  Feel free to share with any allies.
  PT
I would have loved to have battled you to the end, but this will be the last post of the SO for game 5104.

Les please accept my heartfelt apologize!

It would have been one for the ages my friend... Smile
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.