Posts: 485
Threads: 43
Joined: Feb 2015
Reputation:
0
I noticed that all the descriptors under the DP economic list were either Good or Average, yet their economic summary is Below Average. Why is that?
Posts: 5,607
Threads: 618
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation:
0
Just take those with a grain of salt - they haven't been updated in quite some time and meanwhile lots of tweaks to kingdoms.
The overall considers the special abilities kingdoms have, beyond say, starting treasury. So the DE is not bad economically in any category, but there are a number of kingdoms that have special economic orders or advantages that push the overall DE rating down.
Posts: 2,252
Threads: 227
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation:
0
I felt that the DE were well situated financially both times I played them. I had a huge army of skeletons, but didn't have to pay for them at all. I also had plenty of low level wizards always good for 'Create Gold' when orders were tight.
Lord Diamond
Please do not take any of my comments as a personal insult or as a criticism of the game 'Alamaze', which I very much enjoy. Rather, I hope that my personal insight and unique perspective may, in some way, help make 'Alamaze' more fun, a more successful financial venture, or simply more sustainable as a long-term project. Anyone who reads this post should feel completely free to ignore, disregard, scorn, implement, improve, dispute, or otherwise comment upon its content.
